|
![]() A quarterly magazine for truth, faith, and logic. |
|
Vol. 2, Issue 2 | Spring 2008 |
|
Sign up to receive e-mails on updates and new issues: Privacy Policy Praying Hands
from Confessions
Preach the Word
The Church and Social Justice Statements of Great Faith:
I Fear No Darkness
Primum Mobile Staff: Primum Mobile is a quarterly web magazine. This issue and all its contents are © Copyright 2004-2008 by the editors. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise noted, all Scripture quotations taken from the NASB.
|
Preach the Wordby Paul Lytle
As an example, the Church as a whole seems to have gotten a pretty good grasp on the concept of the Trinity, a word that does not even appear in the Bible, and yet still argues about whether we are saved by faith or not, which is stated very plainly in several areas. It is the complicated things the Trinity, in this case that we have down, while the simple alludes us. Perhaps the point is that with these complicated doctrines, we often are not asked to change our lives, while often with the simple ones, we are. We can give a hundred examples of this, but it hardly needs to be done. Just think of all the people you know who go to church on Sunday, and then live like the world on Monday. There is obviously no excusing their behavior: the Word strictly and clearly forbids acting in certain ways, but they do it anyway. Meanwhile, they can believe in the Trinity, because to declare the Trinity to be a true doctrine does not ask them to stop lying at work. In this case, it is very clear in the Word that we should not lie, but that is something that demands action on our part. So it is not accepted by certain people who call themselves Christians. When this is brought to our attention, we are forced to choose. Will we change, or will we excuse ourselves? So we, as a people, come up with all sorts of excuses as to why we do not follow the Word. Obviously, few are just going to say, "I don't want to follow the Word," even though that is what we mean, so we alter our approach to the Bible to justify our actions. The particular passage I want to look at comes from 2 Timothy. Few will admit to ignoring this passage, and yet so many do. Almost everyone, in fact, that I have met in the Church does. Look again at this passage, and the urgency of the instruction:
Paul is not making a suggestion here, but charging Timothy "in the presence of God and of Christ Jesus." This is not something to be taken lightly. And this is at the heart at what I have been saying beforehand. We make our excuses as to why we can ignore certain passages in the Bible, even though passages like this stress the absolute importance of the Word and how we need to be studying and teaching it. But how lightly do we take it? More and more churches are abandoning preaching completely. So-called "Bible studies" do not even look at the Bible, but instead reads Rick Warren's Purpose Driven Life or a book by John Eldridge or something of that nature. Christian counselors spend more talking about Freud than Jesus in their sessions. Christians in general speak with worldly wisdom, probably not even realizing that God calls such wisdom "foolishness" (1 Corinthians 3:19). When we witness to someone, if we witness to someone, we talk of "God-shaped holes" in people rather than teaching them about the Bible. Of course, someone eventually brings these things to our attention, so what excuses do we come up with to justify ourselves? We ignore this passage by claiming to know better than the Bible. Again, few will admit to this in these terms, but that is what we mean. We disguise this habit in many ways. Many preachers will teach by experience primarily, saying that this generation learns better that way. There's nothing wrong with examples and stories, of course, for even Jesus used them, but these preachers center their sermons around the story rather than the Word. Other preachers forgo the sermon completely, having a discussion instead, and so the entire group never moves beyond themselves, because they only have themselves as teachers. Many preachers compromise truth, saying that they must give a little on one doctrine or another in order to get people into the church. Others teach from other philosophies and faiths rather than from the Bible. Even when going to the Bible, we do not preach the Word. We say that the Bible is a personal thing, and so what does it mean to you? We acknowledge, rightly, that Jesus has a personal relationship to us, but then make the jump that revelation is also personal. We say that we can only understand the Bible through cultural perspective, and so we twist the words to mean whatever we want them to mean instead of teaching what they say. This has been a quite common practice lately. One example I have heard is where Jesus is telling people that "it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich person to enter the kingdom of God" (Matthew 19:24). On several occasions I have heard people say that there was a very tiny gate in Jerusalem that was nicknamed "the eye of a needle." So it was very hard to get a camel through, but not impossible. So Jesus was saying that rich people just need to be careful and try hard and they will make it. In another case, people explain the Scripture in Proverbs that says to be kind to your enemies, and in doing so "you will heap burning coals on his head" (Proverbs 25:22). The obvious interpretation is that if you are kind to someone who hates you, he will either come around or just get really mad about the whole thing and damn himself. But some people have said no, that you need understanding in culture to really understand this verse. In those days, they say, if your fire went out, you could go to a neighbor for coals. You would have a bowl on some sort on your head, and they would pour coals into it. Therefore, pouring coals on someone's head is a very kind thing to do, thus reversing the meaning of the verse from what it seems to mean. You aren't hurting the person in the least, but really helping. Sometimes we teach that culture has evolved beyond that primitive time, so some parts we can ignore. Have you heard this? They say that the people of that time just weren't ready to be told that homosexuality is okay, but we were expected to evolve into a more modern understanding. I'm not sure why the Romans, for instance, would not have accepted homosexuality since their culture accepted it more than ours does, but that is the claim. Or that some parts, being the parts we don't like, were cultural, and therefore don't apply. We understand the words of Scripture right in these cases, but they really weren't directed toward us, but for a certain town, for example. It was these cultures to which Paul directed his instructions that women should not preach, for instance, not us. These cultures had too much feminism, and he was merely trying to stop that. Certainly we don't have feminists now, so why would we need the passages? Or that we cannot understand it at all, because words have no meaning. Words are just meaningless sounds we associate with certain things, but there is nothing inherent in a word that conveys meaning. Again, it is cultural. These are some of the main reason we reference to explain why we don't understand the Word or that the Word says something contrary to its clear and obvious meaning. So when Paul tells us, under the witness of God Himself, to preach the Word, this is actually a very controversial statement. This is something that we in the modern Church fight against more times than we accept it. THE NATURE OF THE WORD
"Sweeter than honey." "More desirable than gold." Is that how we see the Word of God? I've met only a few people who really relish the Bible in this way. I think we fear the Bible. I think that we fear that if we find something that we are doing wrong, God will expect us to change. So we just ignore it, or we justify our actions. We also fear the effort it will take to really understand it. But look at the way the Bible talks about itself. This is not a source of pain, but of joy. It is not a source of condemnation, but of restoration. It is not a source of foolishness, but wisdom. It restores the soul, it makes us wise, it rejoices the heart, it is righteous, it is clean, it is pure, and it endures forever. Paul tells us that "All Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness; so that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work" (2 Timothy 3:16-17). In other words, the Word is all those things we talked about, and it is also useful in making us like that. And yet we resist. We make excuses so we won't be confrontational, or we won't have to give up our lifestyles. But I tell you the truth: that the life Christ gives is infinitely better than anything this world can offer. What in this world can claim to be everlasting, pure, holy, able to restore the soul, able to make you wise, and able to rejoice the heart? Nothing. Nothing. I could go on. The Word makes many wonderful claims about itself. But this is hardly my point, and I think I have said enough to show just how important the Bible is. So what could our objections possibly be? OBJECTIONS
One of the things I often hear is that parts of the Bible are cultural, only pertaining to a certain people. It is true that parts are addressed to people or cities, but they still have meaning for us today. We must remember that Jesus was almost as far removed from the first books of the Bible as we are from the New Testament. Did Jesus ever say that part was cultural? Did He tell people to ignore Daniel, for instance, since Daniel was written in Babylon? Certainly Daniel was writing for a certain audience in a certain time, but Christ still quoted from Daniel quite often, and even His favorite name for Himself, "The Son of Man," comes from Daniel 7. The Word of God is eternal. It has applications for all ages and all countries, from Babylon to Rome to England to America and back again. Preach the Word; preach the Word. Some will say that we don't fully understand certain sections because of cultural references. It is true that understanding culture will help us understand fully, but I have never known a cultural reference to counter the clear and obvious meaning of the Word when taken in context. Literary types will understand this better than others. The natural inclination is to say that we cannot understand works from other cultures. The truth is, we can read works like The Epic of Gilgamesh, which was written before Genesis, using only the clues in the text itself. I have done it, and it was not that hard. The Iliad, the Odyssey, Beowulf, these all make sense to us without constant footnotes on cultural references. Certainly, they make more sense with an understanding of the culture, but they are understandable without them. A lack of cultural references does not alter the meaning. An understanding of the culture only deepens the meaning. Do you understand the difference? Let us look to culture to deepen our understanding, but not to alter it. So what about those examples where the cultural meaning is critical to understanding the text? What about the "eye of a needle" and the coals on the head? Trouble is, these cultural references are completely made up. They are not true. They are urban legends. This is exactly the trouble when we lean on human understanding rather than heavenly understanding. How many statements of doctrine have been made on these two particular lies? No, let us trust the Word before men! Again, did Jesus ever make this excuse? Did he ever say, "You understand the Scripture this way, but you don't understand that this phrase meant something different to Moses than it does now." This does not happen. He expects people to understand the Word as written. The Holy Spirit inspired the Word for this people at this time, but the Spirit also inspired it for us, and that same Spirit helps us understand it. Preach the Word; preach the Word. Some people will say they don't understand it. If you have the Spirit, then you can understand it. More than likely, you're just not reading it. You're not studying it. If you need help, go to your pastor, go to a commentary, go to prayer above all. But study it. It takes time, but how better could your time to be used? If you are to understand the Word, you need to study and meditate upon it! If you have no desire to seek God's truth, then you need to question the Spirit within you, not question the Word itself! Preach the Word; preach the Word. Some say they don't want to lose their individuality. They are afraid of conforming to the Word because they think it will force them to stop being themselves. What they mean is that they don't want to stop sinning. Seriously, if there were a part of me that was virtuous, but still very much me, then why would I be scared of losing it? The only things I would be scared of losing is crude humor, sex, unclean thoughts, or something like that. But you're not really following Christ if you love this world. Preach the Word; preach the Word. Should we make compromises in our faith to find a larger audience? God doesn't seem to be extremely pleased with people who live one foot in the world and one foot in heaven (Revelation 3:15-16 for example). We must remember that God will draw His chosen people to the truth. It is truth that we must offer! There are worldly churches that are doing well, and there are solidly Christian churches doing well, but I know of very few churches that compromise their faith and succeed at that. Preach the Word; preach the Word. Is it that the time of sermons is dead? It is true, I have found, that people are tired of poor, compromising sermons that tiptoe around truth as though it were something to be feared. It's the Spirit-filled sermons that draw attention and are really heard. The chosen hear and repent; the wicked hear for the novelty of it. Either way, let the truth be heard! Compromise may work in politics, but would you follow a compromiser when it comes to you immortal soul? No, you want faith, and a faith that believes that the truth will work, no matter if the world does not like it. We should have firm theologies, formed by the truth of Scripture, and we should never stray from that. Preach the Word; preach the Word. It's not the best witness, people will say! It's too confrontational! Well, how will people repent if not brought to the truth of their sins? The Word is meant so we can "reprove, rebuke, exhort, with great patience and instruction." This is supposed to happen for our good. It amazes me how people who claim to believe in God will make the claim that the Word of God just isn't effective, and that their own strategies are. How damningly presumptuous and proud is that? It is our job to preach the truth. It is God's job to bring people to repentance. We are to preach His Word. Preach the Word; preach the Word. To decide that we know better than God what needs to be said is both pride and idolatry. How dare you say that the Bible needs to be compromised, or edited, or presented in a certain way, or altered in any other way! How can you say that God's Word is incomplete and needs your input. Preach the Word. You cannot do better. Meditate upon it day and night (Psalm 1:2). Speak to one another in psalms and hymns (Ephesians 5:19). Demonstrate with Scripture (Acts 18:28). Read the Word. Study it; learn it; seek its way and make them your own. It is God's own guide and instruction to us. There is another objection someone may have, and that is to deny the truth of Scripture completely. If this is so, then we are lost. If the Bible is not true, then we have no hope in this world. All other religions in the world tell us to make ourselves worthy before an infinitely holy and just God. But how do you do that? How do you make yourself good enough for a God who has never sinned, never lied, never misstepped, never said something wrong, never slighted anyone unjustly, and never made a mistake about anything? How do you rise up to that level? How can you be so wonderful that a perfect God agrees that you are worthy of His home? You cannot. Our only way to God is not by earning it, because we can't, but by forgiveness. With a God that is perfectly just, we need mercy. I recently heard John Piper say that every sin will be punished justly. Every wrong will be righted. If you follow those other religions, then the justice is going to fall against you, because you cannot be good enough for a perfectly holy God. But the Bible teaches another way. For those who repent and accept Jesus Christ as their savior, their sins are punished upon the Cross with Him, and we are washed clean and able to approach the Father. If the Bible is not true, and true thoroughly and completely, then we have no hope. Our only chance is that Jesus really is the Son of God, and that He really did die for us. Repent of your sins and follow Him, for, in His own words, "nobody comes to the Father but through me." This is the Word we preach. This is the message of the Bible. If it is faulty, if it is primitive, if it is not understandable, if it is so cultural that it cannot be understood, or if it is insensitive, then we are without hope. If any of these things we say about one verse or another can be true, then we are lost, because if one part of it can be wrong, or if one part can be cultural, or if there is one part that cannot be understood without an outside source, then how can we trust the promise of Christ? He told us to seek our answers here. If He is wrong, then we are lost. I, for one, will stand by the Bible. Have a comment about this article or one of the others in this month's issue? Use the below form or our Respondere page to write to our editors. |